Sociocracy resources

Sociocracy combines consent decision-making, a decentralized system of authority and intentional processes to improve our decisions and processes over time into a governance system that supports effective and efficient process while increasing connection, listening and co-creation among members.

Sociocracy is used in businesses, communities, nonprofits, cooperatives, grassroots groups and in education. See the sociocracy resources on this page to get started.

Go one step deeper:

Free ebook

Are you more the sit-down-and-read type to read all in one go?

We got you!
Download the free ebook and learn more!

sociocracy short introduction thumb - sociocracy resources - Sociocracy For All

Monthly free info sessions

Are you more the “I want to talk to a real human being” kind of learner?

Our free info sessions give you an overview within 60min.
Also ask your questions there.

Free info session video - sociocracy resources - Sociocracy For All

Books from Sociocracy for All

Many Voices One Song

The practical sociocracy handbook written by the co-founders of Sociocracy For All. 300 pages full of real-life support!

cover mockup.jpg - sociocracy resources - Sociocracy For All

Who Decides Who Decides?

How to start a group so everyone can have a voice!

cover mockup ldt 2.jpg - sociocracy resources - Sociocracy For All

Let’s Decide Together

The definitive guidebook for practicing sociocracy with children. Children can decide with sociocracy too!

Sociocracy topics

Each of these short summaries gives you an overview of the sociocracy resources for you to learn more.

Circles

Meetings

Performance

More: Selection process | Writing proposals | Implementation

Browse all of our content

In sociocracy, we make decisions by consent. The goal is to make inclusive decisions fast.

Deciding by consent means no endless discussions and no coercion. A group simply approves a proposal when it's good enough.

With consent, decision-making gets easier and clear. Instead of arguing against each other, we're all on the same side.

A step-by-step consent process helps us make a decision together in an orderly way.

Talking one by one means more clarity, listening, participation, and sync.

Consent is the default decision-making method in sociocracy. In consent, a decision is made when no circle member has an objection. Every person will consent if they can accept the proposal, and object if the proposal has negative implications with respect to the circle’s shared aim.

A group moves to consent in the consent process: presenting the proposal and clarifying questions, quick reactions and a round of consent/objections.

Different from blocking a proposal in consensus decision-making, objections are welcomed as valuable information and they can be integrated by modifying the proposal, its term or its measurements.

See it done

Circles and roles: who decides what?

We trust and empower committees that we call circles. A circle organizes the work and makes decisions together.

Every circle has clarity on their piece of the work and can get things done. Working together. Deciding together.

Two related circles are connected by two people as links. They enable flow of information and balance of power.

The General Circle in the middle makes sure all information comes together and all circles are aligned and clear.

We cluster regular tasks and decisions into roles. The circle sets the frame just enough for everyone to go do things.

Decisions are made in circles, a defined team of people working together towards their circle’s aim. Circle members make collective policy decisions in their domain and they define operational roles to empower individuals to take on responsibility and circle roles to self-manage their circle.

Circles are connected through parent circle/sub-circle relationships of nested domains, leading to a system where everything can be decided locally in the system, without centralizing power at the center. To make sure two circles are connected, we double-link them with two people as members in both circles.

Sociocracy resources on structure: Overview article on structure

Meetings with sociocracy

1. Opening round. At the beginning of the meeting, people share how they are doing.

Meetings are effective, inclusive, and satisfying! Clear roles and a robust meeting template help with that.

2. Respectful of time and topics. We set a clear agenda together and stay on topic.

3. Agenda items. We discuss each agenda item and make use of rounds so everyone gets to speak and people listen to each other.

4. Closing round. At the end of each meeting, we do a full round of feedback on the meeting so we can improve meetings over time.

We track current and future agenda topics to stay accountable for what we care about.

Sociocratic meetings are inclusive and efficient with a clear format:

Opening: check-in and ADMIN
Content of the meeting
- Consent to agenda
- Agenda items
- Review
Check-out (meeting evaluation)

Facilitation is a focus of sociocracy. Rounds – the practice of speaking one by one – are commonly used in meetings to keep equivalence and focus. Rounds also make it easy to run virtual meetings in video calls.

See a meeting

Performance

Feedback is a wonderful way to improve together what we do.

If we make plans and review them together, we can learn from our experiences and improve what we do.

Trust goes both ways. People in roles are empowered to decide but also are expected to ask for advice and listen.

Instead of rigid plans for an unpredictable future, we experiment to feel our way forward by learning.

All sociocratic processes are built on the basic idea of continuous improvement. Feedback is a way to improve what we do, both by creating feedback-rich organizations, a commitment to interpersonal feedback and formal, peer-oriented performance reviews. Other practices are: meeting evaluations in meetings, reviews for all policy decisions and for role selections.

Leadership in sociocracy is peer-oriented and based on accountability to own commitments and to the circle. Many people also combine sociocracy with restorative justice or Nonviolent Communication to align their practice with their values and to improve their effectiveness and communication.

Selection process

Each circle is self managed and picks by consent who will contribute how. For example, facilitator, secretary, leader, and delegate roles.

People are selected for a certain term. That way, we can spread leadership while maintaining clarity.

The circle picks those roles in an open and affirmative process, the selection process.

A sociocratic circle chooses together who will fill an operational or circle role. The most common process to choose that person is the selection process with nominations, change round and consent.

Ready to learn?

Explore our training offerings

Go to a free video series (75min)

More sociocracy resources: articles and videos

Lazy Consent: Care and Power

Language: Español Consent and Lazy Consent In sociocracy, the default decision-making method is consent. Consent is clearly defined as “no objections”, and objections are defined as “a measurable concern that […]
Show Me the Money: Transparent Money Management for Social Changemakers

Saoirse Barry & Hugi Asgeirsson | Sep 28th, 17:10-17:35 UTC.
Weaving Global Governance from Below: Neighbourocracy and Children’s Parliaments in India

Language: Español A Case Study The Dream, the Web “Imagine a [… ] spider’s web in the early morning covered with dew drops. And every dew drop contains the reflection […]
Representation of those most impacted by decisions: Tools for when impact exceeds circle roles (Deborah Chang, Sofie Malm, Hanna Fischer)

Are we making decisions that are affecting more people than are in the room? How can we be more careful about representation? In this session, we will give examples of situations where decisions are affecting a broader group of people. We will offer tools to support us being more inclusive in the decision-making process.
The myth of natural flow

“Why do we need a format to speak? Can’t we just talk naturally?!” What feels “natural” or fair to people in meetings is deeply impacted by informal power structures and biases. Fair meetings require intentional formats.
La Croisée des Chemins: A school using sociocracy

La Croisée des Chemins, or Crossroads, is a cultural center located in Dijon as well as the first democratic free school in France. It uses #sociocracy!
Case study of Treehouse Ecohousing

Treehouse Village Ecohousing is a project to build a cohousing community, the first in Atlantic Canada. It officially launched on Sept 29, 2018 with a first public meeting.
Strategies for integrating objections

Language: Español Integrating objections – how to Integrating objections is one of the core pieces of sociocracy. By integrating objections skillfully, concerns turn into a constructive force to improve your […]
NVC Feelings and Needs List

Language: Español What are nonviolent communication’s universal feelings and needs? Everyone experiences similar basic human feelings and needs. Nonviolent Communication (also known as NVC or compassionate communication) centers around identifying […]
Sociocracy Facilitation Sheet for Better Meetings

Have you ever felt stuck in a meeting? This downloadable cheat sheet for facilitators has all of the key components of sociocratic facilitation on one page!
3 common struggles in sociocratic organizations

Language: Español Governance is never complete and “done”. It needs constant maintenance and fine-tuning. To help you prevent challenges or yo get you past them if you’re already experiencing them, […]
Self-organization – A leap into the unknown

Language: Español Self-organization – a leap into the unknown ‘What?! Self-organization ?! What is self-organization? We have already practiced socialism in this country and it did not work for us. […]